Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) Stock Price Today—Real Time Charts and Quotes

Q: What's the stock price of Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) today?

Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) is currently trading at $57.89, with a 24h change of -0.06%. The 52-week trading range is $51.75–$58.98.

Q: What are the 52-week high and low prices for Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)?

FOX has a 52-week high of $58.98 and a 52-week low of $51.75, with the current price at $57.89.

Q: What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)? What does it indicate?

The current P/E ratio (TTM) of FOX is 10.517644719399028, indicating how much investors pay for each dollar of earnings. A higher P/E ratio often reflects stronger growth expectations, while a lower P/E ratio may suggest a more attractive valuation or slower growth. Comparing it with the average P/E of the Entertainment industry for a better context.

Q: What is the market cap of Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)?

Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) currently has a market cap of approximately $25.83B.

Q: What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)?

Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)'s diluted earnings per share (Diluted EPS) is 4.3672055427251735. EPS = Net Income / Total Diluted Shares, which is a key metric for measuring a company's profitability.

Q: Should you buy or sell Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) now?

As of now, FOX is trading at $57.89, with a P/E ratio of 10.517644719399028 and a diluted EPS of 4.3672055427251735. Your buy or sell decisions should be based on your investment goals and risk tolerance. We recommend making an overall judgment by considering Fox Corp - Class B's financial reports, the outlook of the Entertainment sector, and your own holdings. Investing involves risk—please make decisions prudently.

Q: What factors can affect the stock price of Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)?

Key factors include: company quarterly reports (revenue, EPS), competition and trends in the Entertainment sector, macroeconomic environment (interest rate, inflation), market sentiment, as well as major events like product releases and mergers & acquisitions.

Q: How to buy Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) stock?

You can buy Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) through Gate. Sign up for a Gate account and complete identity verification, then go to the Fox Corp - Class B trading page to make a purchase. Gate supports fractional share trading, so you can start investing without buying a whole share.

$57,89

-$0,04(-%0,06)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-21 19:25 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-21 19:25, Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) is priced at $57,89, with a total market cap of $25,83B, a P/E ratio of 10,51, and a dividend yield of %0,43. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $57,41 and $58,37. The current price is %0,83 above the day's low and %0,82 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 851,80K. Over the past 52 weeks, FOX has traded between $51,75 to $58,98, and the current price is -%1,84 away from the 52-week high.

FOX Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$58,53

Market Cap$25,83B

Volume851,80K

P/E Ratio10,51

Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,43

Dividend Amount$0,28

Diluted EPS (TTM)4,36

Net Income (FY)$2,26B

Revenue (FY)$16,30B

Earnings Date2026-05-11

EPS Estimate0,98

Revenue Estimate$3,78B

Shares Outstanding441,39M

Beta (1Y)0.505

Ex-Dividend Date2026-03-04

Dividend Payment Date2026-03-25

About FOX

Fox Corporation operates as a news, sports, and entertainment company in the United States (U.S.). The company operates through Cable Network Programming; Television; and Other, Corporate and Eliminations segments. The Cable Network Programming segment produces and licenses news, business news, and sports content for distribution through traditional and virtual multi-channel video programming distributors (MVPDs) and other digital platforms, primarily in the U.S. It operates FOX News, a national cable news channel; FOX Business, a business news national cable channel; FS1 and FS2 multi-sport national networks; FOX Sports Racing, a video programming service that comprises motor sports programming; FOX Soccer Plus, a video programming network for live soccer and rugby competitions; FOX Deportes, a Spanish-language sports programming service; and Big Ten Network, a national video programming service. The Television segment acquires, produces, markets, and distributes programming. It operates The FOX Network, a national television broadcast network that broadcasts sports programming and entertainment; Tubi, an advertising-supported video-on-demand service; Fox Alternative Entertainment, a full-service production studio that develops and produces unscripted and alternative programming; MyNetworkTV, a programming distribution service; and Blockchain Creative Labs, which is focuses on the creation, distribution and monetization of Web3 content. This segment owns and operates 29 broadcast television stations. The Other, Corporate and Eliminations segment owns the FOX Studios Lot that provides production and post-production services, including 15 sound stages, two broadcast studios, theaters and screening rooms, editing rooms, and other television and film production facilities in Los Angeles, California. The company was incorporated in 2018 and is based in New York, New York.

SectorCommunication Services

IndustryEntertainment

CEOLachlan Keith Murdoch

HeadquartersNew York City,NY,US

Official Websitehttps://www.foxcorporation.com

Employees (FY)10,40K

Average Revenue (1Y)$1,56M

Net Income per Employee$217,59K

Learn More about Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)

Gate Learn Articles

Gate TradFi Stock Section Launches 44 New CFD Trading Pairs, Unveils New Listings Trading Competition with 100,000 USDT Prize Pool

Gate TradFi will host the Commodity × Stock New Token Trading Competition from March 25 at 12:00 to April 8 at 12:00 (UTC+8).

2026-03-25

What is FOXY?

After Bitcoin (BTC) surged again due to Trump's presidency, another Trump-related meme culture exploded. This time, it’s not just Politifi—AI memes and the leading memes on various chains have brought about new wealth effects. As the leading Layer 2 (L2) chain, Linea has become a focal point for airdrop hunters. Will memes on Linea also experience a market surge?

2024-12-06

XRP Price Forecast: Institutional Holdings Top $11 Billion as RLUSD Stablecoin Accelerates Ecosystem Expansion

The XRP ecosystem is at a critical turning point, evolving from its role as a cross-border payments leader into an institutional-grade asset network. Multiple large enterprises now include XRP on their balance sheets, with Japan’s SBI Holdings holding over $10 billion worth of XRP—ranking as the largest holder worldwide.

2025-10-30

Blogs

SEC Chair’s Statement Sparks Market Frenzy: Will the US Seize Venezuela’s "Strategic Bitcoin Reserves"?

An interview with Fox Business News has turned the mysterious fate of 600,000 Bitcoin held by a sovereign nation into a focal point for the global crypto market.

2026-01-13

FoxCoin: Understanding Its Market Value and Future Growth

As the cryptocurrency market continues to evolve, new digital assets like FoxCoin have begun capturing the attention of investors and traders.

2025-05-14

Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) FAQ

What's the stock price of Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) today?

Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) is currently trading at $57,89, with a 24h change of -%0,06. The 52-week trading range is $51,75–$58,98.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)?

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)? What does it indicate?

What is the market cap of Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)?

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)?

Should you buy or sell Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) now?

What factors can affect the stock price of Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)?

How to buy Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) stock?

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

FOX

CFD

Trade

Fox Corp - Class B (FOX) Latest News

2026-04-07 14:05

Fox News teams up with Kalshi to improve the accuracy of news reporting using predictive market mechanisms

Gate News message: On April 7, the U.S. news network Fox News officially integrated the Kalshi platform, using the prediction market mechanism to add accountability to news coverage while encouraging content to be closer to facts. As one of the three major mainstream news networks in the United States, Fox News hopes to eliminate bias through prediction markets, strengthen accuracy, and ensure that news coverage is not influenced by political positions, keeping correctness as the guiding principle.

2026-03-27 04:46

White House official: David Sacks will continue to serve as the head of AI and cryptocurrency while also serving as the co-chair of PCAST.

Gate News reports that on March 27, according to Fox Business, a senior advisor at the White House stated that David Sacks will continue to serve as the head of artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency at the White House, while being appointed as co-chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). As of now, David Sacks's White House-affiliated X account still displays the title "White House A.I. & Crypto Czar."

2026-03-13 03:19

Google Executive First to Comment: Does Not Rule Out Placing Ads in Gemini

Gate News Report, March 13 — Nick Fox, Senior Vice President of Google Knowledge and Information, stated in an interview that Google "does not rule out" placing ads in Gemini. In recent months, Google executives had firmly maintained that there were no plans to run ads in Gemini. Fox's new statement signals a softening of stance, suggesting that the boundary between Google's core advertising business and AI products may become more blurred. For users relying on Gemini as an independent AI assistant, the introduction of ads will directly impact the user experience and trust in the neutrality of responses.

2026-02-20 03:21

Project Hunt: Token trading tool pepe boost for the past 7 days, the project most unfollowed by top figures

ChainCatcher reports that, according to Web3 asset data platform RootData X tracking data, over the past 7 days, the token trading tool pepe boost has unfollowed the most projects among X (Twitter) Top figures. Influential X personalities who unfollowed these projects include Blue Fox (@lanhubiji), Momo (@momochenming), and Rain Sleep (@0xSleepinRain). Additionally, the projects with the most unfollows from X Top figures also include Calamity, Anoma Network, and Huma Finance.

2026-02-14 03:40

Pompliano reminds investors: Bitcoin's value test is approaching. Can cooling inflation support holding positions?

February 14 News, Bitcoin entrepreneur Anthony Pompliano recently stated that as inflation data declines, Bitcoin investors face the challenge of reassessing their holding motivations. Pompliano pointed out on Fox Business that the value of Bitcoin lies in its limited supply, and when governments increase money issuance, Bitcoin prices tend to rise. He believes that, like gold, Bitcoin is a preferred long-term investment asset, but during periods of weakening inflation, investors may need to be more cautious about their reasons for holding. According to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in January decreased from 2.7% in December to 2.4%. Moody’s chief economist Mark Zandi warned that reported inflation data might be lower than actual experience, implying that market demand for inflation-hedging assets like Bitcoin could be affected in the short term. Pompliano stated that the macroeconomic environment will continue to influence Bitcoin price volatility, referring to this as the “currency slingshot effect”—the short-term deflation masking the dollar’s devaluation trend, which may lead investors to focus more on Bitcoin’s value preservation function in the future. Currently, market sentiment for Bitcoin has fallen to its lowest point since June 2022. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index shows an “extreme fear” score of 9. According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin’s current trading price is approximately $68,850, down nearly 29% over the past 30 days. Pompliano believes the Federal Reserve will continue to expand the money supply to combat inflation, which will further devalue the dollar, and as digital gold, Bitcoin’s value is expected to become more apparent in the future. Pompliano’s view reminds investors that, despite obvious short-term market volatility, Bitcoin remains attractive in the context of the global macroeconomic environment and potential dollar devaluation. Monitoring CPI data and the dollar index closely will help assess the feasibility and potential returns of Bitcoin holding strategies.

Hot Posts About Fox Corp - Class B (FOX)

MetaMaskVictim

2 hours ago

Been digging into Peter Schiff's story lately and honestly, this guy's wealth trajectory is pretty wild. Most people know him as "Dr. Doom" for calling out the 2008 crash before it happened, but what's really interesting is how his net worth has evolved—we're talking $110 million by 2023, up from $70 million in 2019. That's the kind of wealth accumulation that makes you wonder what he's doing differently. Here's the thing that sets Schiff apart from typical Wall Street types: while everyone was chasing the Magnificent Seven stocks like Apple and Amazon, he was all-in on gold and precious metals. At 61, he's actually said he regrets not loading up on those mega-cap tech stocks, but his net worth speaks for itself. Started as a broker at Shearson Lehman Brothers back in the 90s, then co-founded Euro Pacific Capital, which now manages over $2 billion in assets. That's serious firepower. What I find most compelling is his investment philosophy. Schiff genuinely believes the U.S. dollar is on borrowed time—he's been predicting a major decline since 2020 and keeps doubling down on that thesis. His funds are heavily weighted toward gold (around 28% of holdings), and when you look at the numbers, gold has appreciated 27% since the start of the year he was analyzing. He also holds significant stakes in companies like Anterix Inc (238,820 shares worth over $9 million) and has diversified into international equities through his funds. The guy makes serious money too. His monthly earnings hover around $40,000+, with annual income exceeding $500,000. Between Euro Pacific Capital's management fees, speaking engagements on CNBC and Fox News, his YouTube channel, and Schiff Gold operations, the income streams keep flowing. His Euro Pacific International Value Fund jumped over 35% in one year—that's the kind of performance that validates his contrarian approach. Of course, Schiff's not without his critics. His investors saw some brutal drawdowns—60-70% losses in certain accounts over two years, which underperformed the S&P 500 badly. Plus, there were regulatory headaches with Euro Pacific International Bank in Puerto Rico. But here's what's interesting: despite these setbacks, his peter schiff net worth continues growing, and he keeps pushing his economic warnings about hyperinflation and currency debasement. What really stands out is his consistency. Since 2008, he's been recommending people diversify internationally and load up on precious metals. His books like "Crash Proof" and "The Real Crash" built a massive following—500k on Twitter, 300k on Facebook. Love him or hate him, Schiff's influence on the financial community is undeniable. His peter schiff net worth reflects not just investment success, but also his ability to monetize his contrarian worldview across multiple platforms. Looking at his portfolio composition—Euro Pacific Capital's $74.4 billion in international value holdings, Schiff Gold's bullion operations, his personal stock positions—it's clear this is someone who practices what he preaches. Whether his gold-heavy strategy will pay off long-term remains to be seen, but his peter schiff net worth trajectory suggests the market's been rewarding his bets more often than not. The man's built a financial empire on the simple thesis that fiat currency fails eventually, and whether you agree with that or not, you can't argue with the results.

XAU%0,00

金色财经_

4 hours ago

After being hacked for over 40 hours, the chain reaction triggered by Kelp DAO continues to ferment, with more and more well-known projects like Aave, LayerZero, Arbitrum involved, even reaching the point where some popular narratives face a death sentence. Renowned KOL Feng Wuxiang stated on the X platform that only ETH is safe now, and ARB has also authorized freezing and transferring customer assets. No L2 is truly an L2 anymore. L2 rose with Arbitrum, and it also perished with Arbitrum. Another well-known KOL, Blue Fox, said that the biggest loss from the Kelp incident was not Aave or Kelp, but LayerZero, which was too shortsighted to see the true essence of the event. The core issue of this incident is not disproving L2 (even if it’s fake L2), but disproving cross-chain bridges. An increasing number of fierce opinions are emerging in public discourse, with parties involved each sticking to their own narratives and blaming each other, making the Kelp DAO theft a typical window into the debate over security responsibility, pragmatism versus technological fundamentalism. ### 1. L0 Disproved? Cross-Chain Bridges as the Biggest Loser The key point of the incident is LayerZero’s detailed hacker attack report released yesterday, which preliminarily identifies the attacker as North Korea-linked Lazarus Group. The attack was carried out by poisoning its decentralized verification network (DVN) relying on downstream RPC infrastructure. The attacker controlled some RPC nodes and coordinated DDoS attacks to induce the system to switch to malicious nodes, thus forging cross-chain transactions. “Using compromised nodes to poison RPC infrastructure, combined

ZkProver

6 hours ago

*Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher* More than 40 hours after the theft, the chain reaction triggered by Kelp DAO is still fermenting, not only involving more and more well-known projects like Aave, LayerZero, Arbitrum, but even reaching the point where some popular narratives face a death sentence. Well-known KOL Feng Wuxiang stated on the X platform that only ETH is safe now, and ARB has also authorized freezing and transferring customer assets. No L2 is truly an L2 anymore. L2 rose with Arbitrum, and it also perished with Arbitrum. Another well-known KOL, Blue Fox, said that the biggest loss from this Kelp incident was not Aave, nor Kelp, but LayerZero — just because it was shortsighted and failed to see the true essence of the event. The core issue of this incident is not the disproof of L2 (even if it’s fake L2), but the disproof of cross-chain bridges. An increasing number of fierce opinions are emerging in the public discourse, with parties involved each sticking to their own narratives and blaming each other, making the Kelp DAO theft a typical window into the debate over security responsibility, pragmatism versus technological fundamentalism. ### 1. L0 Disproved? Cross-Chain Bridges as the Biggest Loser The key point of the incident is LayerZero’s detailed hacker attack report released yesterday, which preliminarily identifies the attacker as North Korea-backed Lazarus Group. The attack was carried out by poisoning its decentralized verification network (DVN) relying on downstream RPC infrastructure, controlling some RPC nodes and coordinating DDoS attacks to induce the system to switch to malicious nodes, thus forging cross-chain transactions. “Using compromised nodes to poison RPC infrastructure, combined with DDoS attacks on unaffected RPCs to force failover, is very complex. Essentially, this is an infrastructure war,” said Samuel Tse, head of investment and partnerships at Animoca Brands. At the end of the report, LayerZero stated that the protocol operated exactly as expected throughout the incident. No vulnerabilities were found in the protocol. The core feature of LayerZero’s architecture is modular security, and in this case, it perfectly achieved the intended goal by isolating the entire attack within a single application — the whole system had zero contagion risk, and other OFT or OApp were unaffected. This complete disavowal of responsibility became the trigger for a huge public backlash, with many industry figures expressing dissatisfaction with LayerZero’s performance in this incident. “L0 cleaned itself up completely, blaming all the issues on KelpDAO’s misconfiguration, and itself apparently had no problems. Incredible. Why is a 1/1 configuration allowed to exist? Why could the attacker get the internal RPC list? Why does the failover logic trust the polluted RPC directly after DDoS, without stopping verification or doing anything at all?” industry researcher CM questioned. “This deliberate avoidance makes me very uncomfortable. The statement clearly says ‘protocol operated exactly as expected.’ The attack was described as RPC nodes being compromised and RPC poisoning. But RPC poisoning isn’t the case; their infrastructure was invaded and damaged. Since the statement doesn’t explain how the intrusion happened, I won’t rush to re-enable the bridge,” said DeFi developer banteg. Kelp DAO also issued a statement, saying that the single validator (1/1) configuration that led to this attack was not their disregard for advice, but the default setting in LayerZero’s official guide, and the validator network (DVN) exploited by the attacker is LayerZero’s own infrastructure. According to Dune’s analysis, among 2,665 LayerZero-based OApp contracts, 47% use the 1/1 DVN configuration, i.e., single validator mechanism, which greatly amplifies industry risk. More frightening than the problem itself is that the parties involved refuse to admit fault or avoid responsibility. As the leading player in cross-chain communication and Layer0 narratives, hundreds of crypto projects rely on its infrastructure to bridge tokens and assets across different chains. If they continue to be arrogant, it will further undermine industry confidence. Public opinion generally believes that LayerZero, although not directly hacked, has suffered the greatest reputation damage — it must pay the price for “allowing weak configurations,” or the cross-chain narrative will collapse. In other words, LayerZero needs to propose clear technical improvements and also shoulder more responsibility in asset compensation schemes. ### 2. Is Layer2 Dead? Arbitrum’s Extraordinary Freeze The discussion about Layer2 stems from Arbitrum’s freezing behavior. Today at noon, Arbitrum’s Security Council issued an announcement stating that it took emergency action to rescue 30,766 ETH stored in the Arbitrum One address, worth about $71 million. Arbitrum also said that after extensive technical investigation and deliberation, the Security Council decided and executed a technical plan to transfer the funds to a safe location without affecting any other chain states or Arbitrum users. The original address holding the funds can no longer access them, and only the Arbitrum management can take further action to transfer these funds, which will be coordinated with relevant parties. Industry analysts interpret that Arbitrum’s Security Council used a privileged state override transaction type (part of ArbOS, but rarely used), allowing the attacker’s private key to still sign transactions, but the ETH at that address was transferred by the chain itself. This special transaction type completely bypassed the attacker’s private key, and only the chain itself (via sequencer / ArbOS upgrade path, controlled by Arbitrum’s Security Council) could inject such transactions. It is known that the Arbitrum Security Council consists of 12 individuals elected by Arbitrum DAO, and any decision requires approval from 9 out of 12 members. This has caused a huge stir. Previously, the outside world believed that Arbitrum, as a representative Layer2, lacked the ability and authority to handle user ETH assets — which is contrary to the decentralization spirit of blockchain. In past hacking incidents, stolen USDT and USDC could often be frozen immediately by Tether and Circle to reduce user losses. ETH, as the native asset of the chain, has never been frozen or transferred by the chain itself before, exceeding most users’ expectations. Many support Arbitrum’s approach, such as “All companies, banks, and formal financial institutions will eventually adopt secondary architecture. Operating like a centralized entity in critical moments is not a flaw but an advantage.” But many tech enthusiasts see it differently. “No private keys, no authorization, just direct transfer.” In many opinions, Arbitrum’s move redefines the decentralization of Layer2, making users feel insecure about Layer2’s safety. Blue Fox bluntly said that this incident directly touched the core ideological red line of DeFi: “Not Your Keys, Not Your Coins.” This event returns to the classic crypto dilemma: pragmatic security versus fully decentralized security. ### **Conclusion** When LayerZero claims “protocol operated exactly as expected,” it preserves technical correctness but loses public trust and reputation; when Arbitrum uses privileged transactions to transfer $71 million worth of ETH, it saves user funds but severely damages the decentralization narrative of Layer2. The theft of Kelp pushes the two hottest narratives onto the stand simultaneously: Are cross-chain bridges infrastructure or risk amplifiers? Is Layer2 a reliable extension of Ethereum or a secondary bank disguised as decentralization? LayerZero was compromised due to its single validator node mechanism, while Arbitrum used a centralized special voting mechanism to recover losses for LayerZero and Kelp DAO. This creates an extremely ironic closed loop: a protocol that claims decentralization collapses because of “single point vulnerability,” yet ultimately relies on another protocol’s “centralized privilege” to resolve the crisis. It forces the entire industry to confront a question that has never been directly answered: when the ideal of decentralization clashes with the real-world security costs, which side are we willing to sacrifice? The grand narrative debate remains a focus of public opinion, but user compensation schemes are another harsh reality. Even if Arbitrum recovers over $70 million through technical means, Aave still faces nearly $200 million in bad debt, raising questions about how user interests will be protected. In most hacker incidents, losses of tens of millions of dollars are catastrophic for protocols, and user claims are often left unresolved. But this incident involves top projects like Aave and LayerZero, and their bad debt handling plans are highly scrutinized. Today, Aave proposed two possible bad debt solutions: one is socializing the loss among all rsETH holders (sharing across the entire chain), with Kelp DAO applying an approximately 15% value haircut to all rsETH (mainnet + L2); the other is making only L2 rsETH holders bear all losses, while mainnet rsETH maintains its original value. However, Kelp DAO and LayerZero have yet to discuss their roles in the compensation scheme. From LayerZero’s attempt to distance itself from responsibility in the report, it’s clear that the project believes that without responsibility, there is no obligation to compensate. Yet, a multi-billion-dollar valuation protocol, relied upon by hundreds of projects as a foundational layer, choosing “technical exemption” in the face of massive losses caused by DVN default configuration is itself a huge irony of what “underlying infrastructure” means. This is a classic prisoner's dilemma: all parties in crisis try to minimize their own losses through “benefit slicing” rather than sharing responsibility to repair industry trust. From the negative impact of this event on various industry parties, it will be the most dangerous prisoner's dilemma in DeFi history.