DAVE

Dave Inc Price

DAVE
$274,00
+$7,00(+%2,62)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-21 19:26 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-21 19:26, Dave Inc (DAVE) is priced at $274,00, with a total market cap of $3,54B, a P/E ratio of 15,10, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $266,41 and $284,76. The current price is %2,84 above the day's low and %3,77 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 685,79K. Over the past 52 weeks, DAVE has traded between $164,86 to $284,76, and the current price is -%3,77 away from the 52-week high.

DAVE Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$250,71
Market Cap$3,54B
Volume685,79K
P/E Ratio15,10
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Diluted EPS (TTM)14,50
Net Income (FY)$195,86M
Revenue (FY)$511,91M
Earnings Date2026-05-14
EPS Estimate2,65
Revenue Estimate$152,26M
Shares Outstanding14,14M
Beta (1Y)3.822

About DAVE

Dave Inc. provides a suite of financial products and services through its financial service online platform. The company offers Insights, a personal financial management tool to manage income and expenses between paychecks for members; ExtraCash, a free overdraft and short-term credit alternative, which allows members to advance funds to their account and avoid a fee; and Side Hustle, a job application portal. It also provides Dave Banking, a digital checking and demand deposit account. The company was founded in 2015 and is based in West Hollywood, California.
SectorTechnology
IndustrySoftware - Application
CEOJason Wilk
HeadquartersWest Hollywood,CA,US
Official Websitehttps://dave.com
Employees (FY)280,00
Average Revenue (1Y)$1,82M
Net Income per Employee$699,51K

Learn More about Dave Inc (DAVE)

Dave Inc (DAVE) FAQ

What's the stock price of Dave Inc (DAVE) today?

x
Dave Inc (DAVE) is currently trading at $274,00, with a 24h change of +%2,62. The 52-week trading range is $164,86–$284,76.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Dave Inc (DAVE)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Dave Inc (DAVE)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Dave Inc (DAVE)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Dave Inc (DAVE)?

x

Should you buy or sell Dave Inc (DAVE) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Dave Inc (DAVE)?

x

How to buy Dave Inc (DAVE) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Dave Inc (DAVE) Latest News

2026-03-16 03:37

OpenAI, Baidu, Tencent Cloud Sponsor Open Source AI Agent Framework OpenClaw, Path Founder Dave Morin Becomes First Board Director of Foundation

Gate News: On March 16, the GitHub Sponsors page for open-source AI agent framework OpenClaw shows that OpenAI and Baidu are listed as top sponsors. Tencent Light Cloud also appears among the 144 active sponsors, with an additional 65 historical sponsors for the project. Baidu Open Source Office officially announced sponsorship of OpenClaw on GitHub on March 13, becoming the first major Chinese tech company to support the project through GitHub Sponsors. Baidu also plans to integrate its PaddleOCR document parsing capabilities into the OpenClaw ecosystem as a skill. Tencent Light Cloud joined as a sponsor on March 15. Previously, Tencent SkillHub's redistribution controversy had strained relations between the two parties. OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger commented on Discord when sharing sponsorship news, "I like good redemption stories." OpenAI's sponsorship coincided with Steinberger joining OpenAI in February. The OpenClaw project is transitioning to an independent foundation, with OpenAI continuing to provide funding support. Among individual sponsors, Path founder, early Facebook executive, and venture capital firm Slow Ventures founder Dave Morin has become the first board member of the OpenClaw Foundation. He previously co-hosted the ClawCon event in February. OpenAI developer experience lead Romain Huet also appears on the sponsors list as an individual; he was previously interviewed by Steinberger on the Builders Unscripted podcast. The sponsorship page clearly states: Founder Peter Steinberger does not retain any sponsorship funds. 100% of the funds flow back to the community, used to reward contributors who submit code and fix bugs, as well as support upstream open-source projects that the project depends on. Sponsorship levels range from $5 to $500 per month across 8 tiers.

2026-01-15 06:21

Deputy Governor of the Bank of England: Stablecoin deposits may need protection similar to safeguarding bank savings

BlockBeats News, January 15 — According to Bloomberg, Bank of England Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden stated that the UK may need to provide protection for stablecoin deposits similar to safeguarding bank savings. Ramsden mentioned on Wednesday that the central bank is considering how to maintain public trust in the currency if systemically important stablecoins fail.

2025-12-23 05:23

Discussions on the interoperability between Solana and Cardano are heating up, and Toly responded, "Let's do it."

Foresight News reports that Cardano SPO Dave tweeted, "You know I don't like Solana, but I support interoperability. Solana should consider this solution (bringing SOL into ADA), skipping the step of transferring through Base." Solana co-founder Toly replied, "Then let's do it," and Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson subsequently stated, "It's time to get started."

2025-11-28 12:04

Pennsylvania Senator McCormick purchases up to $150,000 Bitcoin ETF, attracting market follow.

Pennsylvania Republican Senator Dave McCormick disclosed this week that he recently purchased a Bitwise Bitcoin ETF worth approximately $65,000 to $150,000. McCormick is a member of the Senate Banking Committee's digital asset subcommittee, and this investment has attracted market attention. According to the periodic trading report, he made two purchases on November 24 and the following day. The Bitwise Bitcoin ETF is managed by Bitwise Asset Management and provides investors with Bitcoin investment opportunities through traditional financial markets. This investment occurs at a time when McCormick is actively participating in discussions about digital asset policies, demonstrating that politicians remain highly attentive to the cryptocurrency market. Analysts believe that such high-level investment behavior not only reflects individual confidence in Bitcoin and related products but may also influence market sentiment to some extent, especially against the backdrop of ongoing policy discussions regarding digital asset regulation in the United States. Overall, the purchase actions of MicroStrategy provide a positive signal at the policy level for the Bitcoin ETF and digital asset market, and highlight the increasingly close connection between traditional finance and crypto investments.

2025-11-19 04:41

Millionaire Dave Portnoy bought the dip with 1 million USD in XRP, stating he missed the last "god-level pump."

According to Golden Finance, Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy bought $1 million worth of XRP on Monday, along with $750,000 worth of Bitcoin and $400,000 worth of Ethereum, for a total investment exceeding $2 million. Portnoy posted a video on X to his 3.7 million followers saying, "So last night I bought a total of $1 million in XRP, 400 ETH, and $750,000 in BTC. The market is bloodied everywhere." He described himself as a "shark" taking advantage of the crash.

Hot Posts About Dave Inc (DAVE)

MrRightClick

MrRightClick

9 hours ago
Just been following this whole Midnight bridge drama in the Cardano community and honestly, it's getting pretty heated. So Charles Hoskinson basically demanded a public apology from a community influencer named ItsDave_ADA after Dave raised some legitimate concerns about how the Midnight Network bridge actually works. Here's what went down. Midnight Network launched its mainnet back in late March with some heavy backing from Google Cloud, Worldpay, and MoneyGram. Charles Hoskinson himself has sunk around $200 million into this project because he sees it as a major play for Cardano's future. The whole idea is to bring privacy-focused services to the ecosystem. But then Dave pointed out something that caught a lot of people's attention - the bridge design is basically one-way right now. You can move assets from Cardano to Midnight without issues, but getting them back? That's where things get messy. There are delays and potential restrictions. Dave basically asked the community whether this actually benefits Cardano holders or if it's just draining liquidity away. Charles Hoskinson fired back pretty hard. He went on social media talking about how Midnight could bring billions in value to Cardano and directly called out Dave, saying the negativity could hurt the whole project's prospects. He even compared it to past community rifts that caused lasting damage. The demand for an apology was pretty direct. Dave didn't back down though. He asked what exactly he should apologize for and pushed Charles Hoskinson for specifics on how value actually flows back to Cardano given the current bridge limitations. Fair question, honestly. The community reaction has been all over the place. Some people defended Charles Hoskinson's vision, pointing out his massive personal investment and arguing that infighting just kills momentum. Others sided with Dave, saying that questioning project decisions is literally what decentralization means. A bunch of people also raised concerns about fees, censorship potential, and control over asset movement. The Midnight team did clarify that the current one-way structure isn't permanent, but they haven't given any timeline for a proper bidirectional trustless bridge. That uncertainty is probably fueling a lot of the debate. What's interesting here is that this isn't just about a bridge design. It's about the bigger question of how privacy sidechains actually integrate into major networks and whether they create real value or just redirect it. The Cardano community is basically wrestling with how to balance innovation, transparency, and the right to ask tough questions. Charles Hoskinson's demanding an apology, Dave's demanding answers, and everyone else is watching to see how this plays out for Cardano's ecosystem long-term.
0
0
0
0
Whale_Whisperer

Whale_Whisperer

9 hours ago
I've noticed that many newcomers in crypto still get confused about terminology. For example, I constantly hear questions: what exactly is a satoshi? And is it really related to the creator of Bitcoin? Let's figure it out. A satoshi is essentially the smallest unit of Bitcoin — 0.00000001 BTC. Named after Satoshi Nakamoto, that very person (or group of people) who created the first cryptocurrency. But here’s an interesting point: when Bitcoin first appeared, there was no need for satoshis. The price was so low that dividing the currency didn’t make sense. I remember, in 2009, 5050 bitcoins were sold for $5. Seriously. However, by 2011, the situation changed dramatically. A forum user named ribuck proposed introducing a minimum unit — 1/100 BTC. At first, no one paid attention, but when the quotes rose to a dollar, the idea gained support. And so, satoshis became an official unit of measurement. Named after the creator — makes sense. By the way, the ratio was not chosen randomly. If a kopeck is a hundredth of a ruble, then a satoshi is one hundred-millionth of a Bitcoin. Apparently, the developers already believed in the potential for price growth back then. Now, to the main question: who really is Satoshi Nakamoto? Honestly, it’s still a mystery. Over the years, many theories have been proposed. In 2014, the press introduced Dorian Nakamoto — an American of Japanese descent, a programmer from Los Angeles. He immediately denied it. Later, Hal Finney, a cryptography pioneer who received the first Bitcoin transaction in history, was suspected. Finney also denied it until the end of his life. Then, Niko Saboe, a cryptography expert, was suggested as Nakamoto. Researchers found similarities between his work and Bitcoin’s white paper. But there was no proof. Later, Craig Wright appeared, who, unlike the others, publicly claimed that he was the one who developed Bitcoin. However, when irrefutable evidence was required, he couldn’t provide it. There’s also a theory about Dave Kleiman — a programmer and former soldier. But there’s no concrete evidence there either. So, satoshi remains one of the most intriguing mysteries in the crypto industry. The creator’s identity remains unknown to this day, and perhaps that’s even a good thing — it adds a touch of mystique.
0
0
0
0
FOMOSapien

FOMOSapien

10 hours ago
Just watched this whole Cardano drama unfold and it's honestly fascinating how quickly things escalated. On April 1st, Charles Hoskinson basically demanded a public apology from ItsDave_ADA over criticism about the Midnight Network bridge design, and the community has been split ever since. So here's what went down: Midnight Network went mainnet late March with some seriously heavy backing—Google Cloud, Worldpay, MoneyGram all in. Charles Hoskinson himself has pumped roughly $200 million into this thing, so yeah, he's clearly betting big on it becoming a major privacy-focused sidechain for Cardano. But Dave raised a legit concern that everyone's been talking about—the bridge at launch was basically one-way only. You could move assets from Cardano to Midnight trustlessly, but getting stuff back? That's where it got messy with delays and potential restrictions. Dave's question was simple but pointed: does this actually benefit Cardano holders, or are we just seeing value flow out? He was asking whether Midnight would genuinely create new opportunities for the chain or if it was more of a siphon. Charles Hoskinson fired back hard, emphasizing Midnight's potential to bring billions in value to Cardano long-term and basically said Dave needed to publicly walk back his criticism. He even warned that this kind of negativity could damage Cardano's prospects. What's interesting is how the community split on this. Some people backed Charles Hoskinson's vision, acknowledging his personal stake and the long-term symbiotic potential between the two projects. They were worried internal conflict could tank progress. Others sided with Dave, arguing that questioning decisions is exactly what decentralization means. They weren't against Midnight—they just wanted clarity on how value actually flows back to Cardano given the current bridge structure. The real technical concerns that emerged were pretty substantive: the unidirectional nature, potential fee structures, and who controls asset movement back to the main chain. Some dismissed Dave as spreading FUD, but plenty of people respected his scrutiny and argued that healthy networks need open debate, not consensus theater. Midnight's team did clarify that the current bridge design isn't permanent, but they haven't given a timeline for a truly trustless bidirectional bridge. That ambiguity is probably fueling a lot of the ongoing discussion. What Charles Hoskinson and the broader community are wrestling with is actually pretty fundamental: how do you balance innovation and expansion with transparency and genuine value creation for the core network? It's not a new debate in crypto, but it's playing out in real time here with Midnight and Cardano. The apology Dave was asked to give never materialized, and the conversation keeps going. Kind of tells you where things stand.
0
0
0
0