Buy Crypto
Pay with
USD
USD
Buy & Sell
Hot
Supports Visa, Mastercard, SEPA & more
P2P
0 Fees
Flexible trading, zero fees
Gate Card
Use your crypto for payments worldwide
Markets
Trade
Basic
Advanced
Futures
Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Earn
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
tag
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Square
Square
Post, share, and explore crypto trends
Live
moments live
Live crypto market analysis
Chat
Chat with crypto traders
News
What is happening in crypto
flower_head
More
Promotions
AI
Diğerleri
TradFi
SpaceX Pre-IPOs
Rewards
BEN

Franklin Resources Inc Price

BEN
$27,30
-$0,43(-%1,55)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-21 17:32 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-21 17:32, Franklin Resources Inc (BEN) is priced at $27,30, with a total market cap of $14,44B, a P/E ratio of 22,67, and a dividend yield of %2,38. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $27,29 and $28,27. The current price is %0,03 above the day's low and %3,43 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 3,76M. Over the past 52 weeks, BEN has traded between $22,62 to $28,27, and the current price is -%3,43 away from the 52-week high.

BEN Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$27,27
Market Cap$14,44B
Volume3,76M
P/E Ratio22,67
Dividend Yield (TTM)%2,38
Dividend Amount$0,33
Diluted EPS (TTM)1,19
Net Income (FY)$524,90M
Revenue (FY)$8,77B
Earnings Date2026-04-28
EPS Estimate0,56
Revenue Estimate$1,70B
Shares Outstanding529,54M
Beta (1Y)1.473
Ex-Dividend Date2026-03-31
Dividend Payment Date2026-04-10

About BEN

Franklin Resources, Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company. Through its subsidiaries, the firm provides its services to individuals, institutions, pension plans, trusts, and partnerships. It launches equity, fixed income, balanced, and multi-asset mutual funds through its subsidiaries. The firm invests in the public equity, fixed income, and alternative markets. Franklin Resources, Inc. was founded in 1947 and is based in San Mateo, California with an additional office in Hyderabad, India.
SectorFinancial Services
IndustryAsset Management
CEOJennifer Johnson
HeadquartersSan Mateo,CA,US
Official Websitehttps://www.franklinresources.com
Employees (FY)9,80K
Average Revenue (1Y)$894,96K
Net Income per Employee$53,56K

Learn More about Franklin Resources Inc (BEN)

Gate Learn Articles

Who is BitBoy, the Crypto Influencer? A Comprehensive Overview + Latest Updates and Controversies

Who is BitBoy? This article offers a detailed exploration of crypto influencer Ben Armstrong’s ascent, controversies, and brand transformation. It also covers his recent legal disputes and influence on the industry, giving you a thorough insight into this well-known crypto personality.

2026-01-21

All You Need to Know About $PASTERNAK Token

$PASTERNAK Token is the first token issued by the Clout platform initiated by tech entrepreneur Ben Pasternak. Since its release on January 24, 2025, $PASTERNAK has quickly attracted market attention. This article will delve into the project background, token economics, market performance, community support, investment opportunities, risks, and prospects for its future development.

2025-02-10

Clout: Revolutionizing the Creator Economy with SocialFi

Clout is a SocialFi application that allows users to issue personal tokens and convert social media influence into tradable assets. Its innovation combines FriendTech's social capitalization logic and Pump.fun's low-threshold currency issuance mechanism, attracting Web2 users through simplified processes and legal currency entry. Founder Ben Pasternak uses industrial thinking to promote the integration of Internet celebrity economy and encryption technology, trying to create "Wall Street + Hollywood in the Web3 era".

2025-02-06

Blogs

What Is Ben V2? BEN Token Price Prediction

Ben (v2) attempts to carry out the mission of DeFi utility under the identity of Meme, but in the short term, it is still constrained by regulatory risks, lagging ecological development, and a market trust crisis.

2025-07-24

PASTERNAK tokens: representative tokens of the Clout platform

This article delves into the role and importance of the PASTERNAK token in the Solana ecosystem. The article details the tokens founder, Ben Pasternak, and the innovative mechanisms of the Clout platform.

2025-01-26

Franklin Resources Inc (BEN) FAQ

What's the stock price of Franklin Resources Inc (BEN) today?

x
Franklin Resources Inc (BEN) is currently trading at $27,30, with a 24h change of -%1,55. The 52-week trading range is $22,62–$28,27.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Franklin Resources Inc (BEN)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Franklin Resources Inc (BEN)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Franklin Resources Inc (BEN)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Franklin Resources Inc (BEN)?

x

Should you buy or sell Franklin Resources Inc (BEN) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Franklin Resources Inc (BEN)?

x

How to buy Franklin Resources Inc (BEN) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

BEN
CFD
Trade

Franklin Resources Inc (BEN) Latest News

2026-04-14 15:52

Believe Founder Faces Rug Pull Charges as DOJ Opens $40M OneCoin Victim Compensation

Gate News message, April 14 — Ben Pasternak, the 26-year-old Australian founder of Solana-based platform Believe, is facing indictment in New York federal court over an alleged rug pull scheme, while the U.S. Department of Justice has opened a compensation process for victims of the OneCoin fraud with over $40 million in forfeited assets now available. Prosecutors allege that Pasternak's platform, previously called Clout, engaged in a deceptive cycle of rug pulling by launching a series of tokens: $PASTERNAK, later rebranded as $LAUNCHCOIN, and then $BELIEVE. Civil lawsuits claim the platform processed over $6 billion in trades and extracted approximately $54 million in fees while investors suffered massive losses. The case is under review in the Southern District of New York. The DOJ's compensation program targets victims of OneCoin, a fraudulent cryptocurrency marketed as a "Bitcoin killer" that operated from Sofia, Bulgaria, between 2014 and 2019. The scheme defrauded an estimated 3.5 million people out of over $4 billion. Victims who purchased OneCoin during those years may file for compensation by the June 30, 2026 deadline. OneCoin co-founder Karl Sebastian Greenwood was sentenced to 20 years in prison, while the other co-founder, Ruja Ignatova, known as the "Cryptoqueen," remains on the FBI's Top Ten Most Wanted list. Both cases are being handled by the Southern District of New York.

2026-04-09 10:47

A CEX co-founder donates $5.4 million to the UK’s Reform UK party

Gate News message: On April 9, a CEX co-founder, Ben Delo, disclosed that he had donated $5.4 million (about £4 million) to the Reform UK Party, led by Nigel Farage. The donation took place before new regulations were introduced in the UK setting a £100k cap on donations from overseas expats. Delo previously pleaded guilty in the United States in 2022 for the exchange violating anti-money-laundering compliance rules, paid a $10 million fine, and was later pardoned by Trump. Reform UK previously received a £11.4 million donation from Christopher Harborne, a Thai national and a Tether investor. The party positions itself as the most crypto-friendly political party in the UK, but the UK government has issued a suspension order on cryptocurrencies in political donations. Delo said he plans to move to the UK, at which point he will not be subject to donation limits.

2026-03-25 12:01

StarkWare CEO: Current Crypto Bear Market Has Shifted from "Fraud Winter" to "Traditional Finance Bear Hug"

Gate News, March 25 — StarkWare CEO and former Zcash co-founder Eli Ben-Sasson posted on X reflecting on the evolution of the crypto cycle. He pointed out that compared to the previous "crypto winter," which was driven by the Terra collapse, Three Arrows Capital, FTX, and filled with fraud and excessive speculation, the current bear market exhibits very different characteristics. This cycle is more like a "Traditional Finance (TradFi) Bear Hug," where, amid warmer regulation and the accelerated entry of mainstream financial institutions, the crypto industry was once seen as a new financial infrastructure. However, it has also, to some extent, squeezed the original spirit of "economic freedom and experimental innovation." Eli Ben-Sasson stated that although the crypto industry is currently in a phase of limited short-term innovation and leadership gaps, in the long run, freedom and innovation will return and drive the next wave of development.

2026-03-25 05:31

StarkWare CEO: The Nature of Crypto Bear Market Has Shifted, From "Fraud Winter" to "TradFi Bear Hug"

Gate News, March 25 — StarkWare CEO and former Zcash co-founder Eli Ben-Sasson posted on X reflecting on the evolution of the crypto cycle. He pointed out that compared to the previous "crypto winter," which was triggered by the Terra collapse, Three Arrows Capital, FTX, and filled with fraud and excessive speculation, the current bear market cycle exhibits very different characteristics. This cycle is more like a "Traditional Financial Bear Hug (TradFi Bear Hug)." Against the backdrop of warming regulation and accelerated entry of mainstream financial institutions, the crypto industry was once seen as new financial infrastructure, but at the same time, it has also somewhat squeezed the original spirit of "economic freedom and experimental innovation." Eli Ben-Sasson stated that although the crypto industry is currently in a phase of limited short-term innovation and leadership vacuum, in the long run, freedom and innovation will return and drive the next wave of development.

2026-03-03 08:14

CEX co-founder Ben Delo donates $27 million to support the London Mathematical Science Institute, accelerating scientific research and innovation in the UK

On March 3, according to Cointelegraph, a co-founder of a major centralized exchange (CEX), Ben Delo, pledged to donate approximately $27 million to the London Institute of Mathematical Sciences (LIMS), making it one of the largest private donation recipients outside of Oxford and Cambridge in the UK. This funding includes a $13.3 million advance payment and an equal amount raised through additional fundraising to establish a long-term endowment fund totaling $80 million, supporting research in theoretical physics, pure mathematics, and artificial intelligence. Ben Delo stated that he hopes the institute's scholars will win Fields Medals and Nobel Prizes. He emphasized that choosing LIMS over large universities allows researchers to focus on scientific research without the burden of teaching and administrative duties. He also criticized the UK’s research funding system for lacking vitality and coherence. Delo has previously funded the Ben Delo Scholarship and supports charitable causes such as neurodiversity, academic freedom, and mathematics education. Reports indicate that Delo paid a $10 million fine before receiving a pardon from Donald Trump, after admitting responsibility along with co-founders for violating U.S. banking laws. In March 2025, President Trump granted him a pardon, allowing him to continue participating in scientific research and philanthropy. LIMS was founded in 2011 by physicist Thomas Fink and is located within the Royal Institution of the UK. Its offices were once the residence of chemist Michael Faraday. The institute offers three-year scholarships for scientists and funds exiled researchers, attracting scientists worldwide. Meanwhile, UK lawmakers are calling for a temporary ban on political donations via cryptocurrencies, warning that such payments could lead to foreign interference. Previously, Reform UK received a record-breaking $12 million in political donations from early cryptocurrency investor Christopher Harborne. Industry experts believe that as crypto assets continue to enter academic and political spheres, regulation and compliance issues will become key concerns.

Hot Posts About Franklin Resources Inc (BEN)

MetaMisfit

MetaMisfit

2 hours ago
Just caught wind of something that's stirring up real debate in the ecosystem. Tempo just launched Zones, this new permissioned layer backed by Stripe and Paradigm that's designed to bring enterprise-grade privacy to public blockchains. On the surface, it sounds practical—companies can handle sensitive stuff like payroll and treasury management in controlled environments while still tapping into public liquidity. But here's where it gets interesting. The privacy question is becoming the central tension. Zones work as parallel, permissioned sub-chains where an operator essentially has visibility into transaction data and can control access. The public network validates the batched updates, so there's still some blockchain verification happening. Tempo's pitch is that this gives you enterprise compliance and auditability without totally abandoning the openness of public chains. But a lot of privacy-focused builders are pushing back hard. Their argument is pretty straightforward: if an operator can see your transactions and theoretically suspend transfers, you've basically reintroduced a trusted intermediary. That's not really different from a centralized database or brokered exchange, they say. You lose the self-custody guarantee and the cryptographic assurances that make decentralized networks actually decentralized. What's fascinating is how split the industry is on this. You've got projects like ZKSync going the zero-knowledge route, keeping transaction data confidential end-to-end through cryptographic proofs. Then there's Zama pushing fully homomorphic encryption so computations happen on encrypted data—privacy preserved without exposing the underlying information. Ghazi Ben Amor from Zama made a solid point: the goal is to make cryptography invisible to developers, so you can write normal Solidity code while encryption handles the heavy lifting in the background. That's fundamentally different from Tempo's operator-managed model. The real question now is whether the market settles on operator-centric designs for simplicity and interoperability, or if cryptography-first approaches become the standard for serious institutional adoption. Tempo's got real backing and real enterprise interest, so this isn't just theoretical. But the privacy trade-offs they're making are worth scrutinizing as deployments actually start rolling out. Keeping an eye on how this plays out. Early case studies from Zone operators will tell us a lot about whether this privacy model actually holds up under real-world use, and whether regulators see it as compliant enough. The broader pattern is clear though: there's no one-size-fits-all answer for enterprise blockchain privacy. Different approaches, different privacy guarantees, different risks. Worth understanding which trade-off you're actually signing up for.
ZK-%0,73
ZAMA+%6,05
0
0
0
0
WhaleStalker

WhaleStalker

2 hours ago
Been following this Tempo thing and it's actually raising some pretty important questions about how we're gonna solve privacy at scale in crypto. They just dropped a feature called Zones with backing from Stripe and Paradigm, and it's basically trying to let enterprises run private transactions on public infrastructure. Sounds good in theory, but the privacy infrastructure debate it's sparked is worth paying attention to. So here's the core tension: how do you give institutions the privacy and compliance controls they need without turning public blockchains back into centralized databases? Tempo's answer is Zones—basically parallel, permissioned chains attached to their main network. Enterprises can handle sensitive stuff like payroll, treasury ops, B2B settlements in these isolated environments while still tapping into public liquidity pools when needed. The technical setup is interesting. Each Zone gets an operator who manages access and can see transaction data. Meanwhile, the public network validates the batched state updates and proofs. Tempo frames this as combining the auditability enterprises expect from traditional finance with the efficiency and liquidity of public blockchain rails. It's a practical pitch for regulated financial players who want to move to crypto but can't just abandon compliance frameworks. But here's where the privacy news gets contentious. A whole camp of cryptography-first builders are pushing back hard, and they've got a point. Critics argue that letting an operator see transaction data and control who can transfer or withdraw funds basically reintroduces a trusted intermediary. That's not trivial—it potentially weakens the self-custody and trustless guarantees that drew people to decentralized networks in the first place. The debate really boils down to different philosophies about privacy infrastructure. Tempo's model is operator-centric: you get privacy through access control and isolation. But other projects are exploring fundamentally different approaches. ZK-based chains like ZKSync anchor private transactions to public networks using zero-knowledge proofs, keeping data confidential without requiring an intermediary to hold visibility. Then there's the cryptography-first camp—companies like Zama are pushing fully homomorphic encryption, where computations happen on encrypted data without exposing the underlying information. Ghazi Ben Amor from Zama made an interesting point about this. He acknowledged that advanced cryptography is complex, but the goal is to abstract that away for developers so they can write contracts in Solidity while encryption runs behind the scenes. His take on Tempo's Zones? Essentially private blockchains managed by operators, which carries centralized risks that cryptographic guarantees wouldn't have. It's a fair critique, even if Tempo hasn't directly responded. What's really happening here is a strategic fork in how the industry is approaching institutional adoption. Tempo and allies like Stripe and Paradigm are betting that enterprises want familiarity—governance, compliance, auditability, the stuff they're used to from traditional finance. Lower the friction, make it feel like regulated oversight, and institutions will come. That's not an unreasonable bet. But the privacy-conscious builders are playing a longer game. They're saying: why compromise on the core promise of crypto if we can build privacy infrastructure that doesn't require trusting an operator? The complexity might be higher, the developer experience rougher, but the guarantees are stronger. Honestly, I think both paths probably exist simultaneously. Some enterprises will go with Tempo's model because it's pragmatic and familiar. Others will wait for cryptography-first solutions to mature. The real question is which approach wins more market share as institutions actually start deploying. What to watch: How do Zone operators handle access control in practice? Does the auditability model hold up under real scrutiny? Will regulators actually accept this hybrid model, or will they push for something closer to traditional custody? And critically, will cryptography-first approaches actually become practical enough for mainstream developers, or do they stay niche? The privacy infrastructure landscape is getting more interesting because the stakes are higher. It's not just about hobbyist privacy anymore—it's about whether institutions can migrate to public blockchains without surrendering control. Tempo's Zones are one answer. The zero-knowledge and homomorphic encryption approaches are others. The market will probably settle on a spectrum rather than a single winner. For anyone watching privacy developments in crypto, this is worth monitoring closely. The architecture choices being made now—operator-centric vs. cryptography-first—could shape institutional blockchain adoption for years. Real deployments will tell us a lot about whether these privacy solutions actually work at scale, and whether the trade-offs are acceptable to regulated financial players moving into the space.
ZK-%0,73
0
0
0
0
Bykaranteli

Bykaranteli

11 hours ago
JUST IN: Trump’s midterm fundraising hits $550M, with Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz each donating $3M in March; this level of political fundraising can shape policy debates and could impact crypto regulation.
0
0
0
0