Gate News message, April 17 — Australian billionaire and mining executive Andrew Forrest is challenging Meta in court, asking a judge to rule that the platform cannot use Section 230 protections to avoid liability for deceptive Facebook ads that used his image to promote cryptocurrency and financial scams. According to the suit, thousands of paid ads have used Forrest’s likeness since 2019, with Meta’s ad tools helping to optimize, personalize, and distribute the fraudulent content.
Meta argues that advertisers created the ads, not the company, and that it took reasonable steps to preserve relevant data. However, a federal judge found a factual dispute over Meta’s role, stating that if Meta’s ad-creation and optimization tools helped produce the allegedly illegal content, Section 230 protections may not apply at the motion-to-dismiss stage. The judge allowed Forrest’s claims, including negligence and misappropriation, to proceed, with a ruling expected in the coming weeks.
The case is part of a broader legal strategy to narrow Section 230 defenses by targeting platform design and systems rather than treating platforms as passive publishers. Other plaintiffs are now citing this ruling in similar cases involving Meta’s ad tools, raising concerns that platforms could face significantly increased liability for third-party advertisements they help optimize or distribute.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Galaxy Research Chief: U.S. OFAC Sanctions List Involves 518 Bitcoin Addresses
The U.S. Treasury's OFAC sanctions list includes 518 Bitcoin addresses that have significantly engaged in crypto transactions, currently holding about 9,306 BTC valued at $707 million, highlighting the relationship between cryptocurrency and financial regulation.
GateNews8h ago
SEC Crypto Shift Clarifies Rules Without Blanket Approval
The SEC has adopted a more lenient stance on crypto regulation, allowing some interfaces to operate without broker-dealer registration, but has not given blanket approval for the industry. Recent guidance clarifies how crypto assets are categorized, emphasizing that federal securities laws apply mainly to digital securities. Enforcement activity has decreased as the agency focuses on fraud and market integrity.
CryptoFrontier17h ago
Polish lawmakers want to overturn the president’s veto of the cryptocurrency bill but failed again in their latest attempt to push it through.
Poland’s parliament failed to override the president’s veto of the cryptocurrency regulatory bill, stalling the process of digital-asset legislation and making it one of the few countries in the EU that has not yet implemented the MiCA framework. Differences between the president and the government over the bill’s content led to a political stalemate, affecting market confidence and legal transparency.
ChainNewsAbmedia19h ago
Polish Parliament Fails to Override President's Veto on Crypto Law; PM Alleges Russian Interference
Polish lawmakers failed to override President Nawrocki's veto on a cryptocurrency regulation bill aimed at aligning with EU standards. Tensions rise as accusations emerge of Russian influence in a major crypto exchange amid liquidity issues and lack of regulation.
GateNews21h ago
White House Mediates Clarity Act Stablecoin Dispute, Witt Reveals Legislative Timeline
Patrick Witt announced at the Solana Policy Institute summit that the White House mediated a stablecoin dispute to advance the Clarity Act. The compromise allows banks and crypto firms to together address regulatory concerns, with future focus on crypto taxation and blockchain integration strategies among financial institutions.
GateNews04-18 05:51
Hong Kong SFC Investment Committee Warns Prediction Market Trading May Constitute Illegal Gambling
The Hong Kong SFC warns that prediction markets are speculative and not investment products, lacking regulatory protection. They involve gambling elements, potentially making them illegal. The committee urges the public to differentiate between investment and gambling.
GateNews04-18 03:46
