Kevin O’Leary wins the case! BitBoy defamation lawsuit results in a $2.8 million payout, sparking heated discussion over the consequences of "doxxing" on social media platforms

On February 14, Kevin O’Leary won a default judgment in a defamation case against Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong in the Southern District of Florida Federal Court, receiving a total award of $2.8 million. The court found that the defendant’s posting of “malicious” false accusations and private information on social media constituted serious defamation and punitive damages.

The ruling awarded O’Leary $750,000 in emotional distress damages, $78,000 in reputation damages, and an additional $2 million in punitive damages. The judge noted that as a public figure engaged in media and business collaborations, damage to O’Leary’s reputation would directly impact his performance invitations and business relationships. Expert testimony, based on the viewership of the relevant posts, the size of the affected audience, and repair costs, estimated the reputation loss at $78,000.

The dispute originated from multiple posts made by Armstrong in March 2025, accusing O’Leary of involvement in a fatal boat accident in 2019, and publicly sharing his private phone number in one post, urging fans to “call the murderer in real life.” The court found that O’Leary was only a passenger at the time and was not prosecuted; his wife was also declared innocent after the trial. The accident investigation indicated that another boat had no lights at the time. After the phone number was leaked, O’Leary received hundreds of calls, leading to an annual security expense of approximately $200,000 and changes to his travel and work routines for safety reasons.

Procedurally, O’Leary filed suit on March 26, 2025; service was completed by March 28. Armstrong repeatedly failed to respond within the deadline, despite court extensions and clear warnings, and did not submit a response. The clerk entered a default on May 6. A damages hearing was held on October 30, with Armstrong still absent. He later sought to dismiss the case citing detention and bipolar disorder, but the court found he had been properly notified, delayed nearly a year, and was harming the plaintiff’s interests, and thus dismissed the motion.

This case serves as a warning: spreading false accusations and “doxxing” others on social media can lead to high damages and long-term legal consequences. The parties involved include Kevin O’Leary, Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong, and O’Leary’s public role as an investor on “Shark Tank.”

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Drift says $270 million exploit was a six-month North Korean intelligence operation

A six-month intelligence operation preceded the $270 million exploit of Drift Protocol and was carried out by a North Korean state-affiliated group, according to a detailed incident update published by the team earlier on Sunday. The attackers first made contact around fall 2025 at a major crypto c

CoinDesk5h ago

A forecasting platform removes a missing U.S. Air Force pilot market, triggering controversy over rule transparency and insider trading

A prediction platform was taken down for violating rules after it posted a prediction market about missing American pilots, sparking controversy. The market showed that most users believed the pilots would not be rescued in the short term. Congressman Moulton criticized the transaction as disgusting, questioned the transparency of the rules, and expressed concern about insider trading, calling for stronger regulation.

GateNews8h ago

Judge continues Nevada ban on Kalshi sports markets

A state judge in Nevada extended a temporary ban on prediction market provider Kalshi's sports-related contracts in the Silver State on Friday. Judge Jason Woodbury in the First Judicial District Court told attorneys at a hearing in the Carson City courthouse that he would also grant the Nevada

CoinDesk9h ago

A Gansu Tianshui Court Tries a Virtual Currency Money Laundering Case: The Defendant Who “Ran Errands to Withdraw Cash” Was Sentenced to Two Years and Four Months

A court in Qinzhou District, Tianshui City, Gansu Province, is trying a virtual-currency money-laundering case. The defendant used a part-time “high-paying errands” job to withdraw more than 390k yuan and, with knowledge of what was going on, exchange it for virtual currency, earning a profit of 21.5k yuan. The court sentenced him to two years and four months in prison and fined him. The judge reminded the public to stay alert to related activities in order to prevent them from fueling crime.

GateNews9h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments