DeFi Leaders Urge SEC to Formalize Broker Guidance Into Rulemaking

CryptoFrontier
AAVE-1,14%
UNI-0,7%

DeFi Industry Pushes for SEC Rulemaking on Broker Classification

The DeFi Education Fund, alongside 35 other crypto industry leaders, has urged the Securities and Exchange Commission to formalize its recent decentralized finance interface guidance into formal rulemaking, according to a letter sent to the SEC this week.

The request follows an SEC statement released earlier this month that clarified certain user interface providers, such as DeFi wallets, do not need to register as broker-dealers.

Letter Requests Principles-Based Framework

In the letter, the crypto groups pressed the agency to conduct rulemaking and adopt a formal regulatory approach. “Specifically, the Commission should consider adopting a principles-based framework that provides clear, objective criteria for when activity falls within the definition of ‘broker,’ iterating on the criteria in the Statement,” the groups stated. “Finalizing these principles would provide the legal certainty needed to support responsible innovation while preserving the Commission’s ability to regulate the intermediaries that pose the risks that the broker-dealer regulatory regime was designed to address.”

Organizations Signing the Letter

Other advocacy groups that signed the letter include the Crypto Council for Innovation, the Blockchain Association, and the Solana Policy Institute. Aave Labs, Andreessen Horowitz, Uniswap Labs, and Mysten Labs, Inc. also signed on.

SEC’s April 13 Statement on Broker-Dealer Classification

On April 13, the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets released a staff statement delineating that interfaces, such as DeFi wallets, would generally not be considered a broker-dealer. The SEC described the guidance as an “interim step while the Commission continues to consider various regulatory issues.”

The SEC outlined specific scenarios where an interface could be classified as a broker-dealer, including if it solicits investors, makes investment recommendations, or sways routing order decisions.

Industry Concerns About Informal Guidance

While the DeFi Education Fund and other groups called the SEC’s statement “an important step,” they warned that the guidance may not have lasting power. “As the digital asset industry knows too well, reliance on informal guidance has its own risks,” they said in the letter. “It is critically important that the Commission prevent an overly expansive interpretation of the term ‘broker’ from existing now or being revived in five years.”

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Brazil Bans Kalshi, Polymarket Citing Investor Protection Concerns

Brazil has enacted a sweeping ban on prediction markets and betting platforms, according to local media and government filings. The two leading prediction markets, Polymarket and Kalshi, were inaccessible to researchers based in the country following the ban. Regulatory Framework and Scope The

CryptoFrontier9m ago

SEC Chair Paul Atkins Announces Digital Asset Classification Framework with CFTC

Gate News message, April 26 — U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul Atkins has reaffirmed efforts to advance "Project Crypto" and announced a joint initiative with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to establish a digital asset classification framework that will clarify

GateNews57m ago

Tennessee, United States, fully bans the use of cryptocurrency ATMs

Tennessee Governor signs Bill 2505, fully banning the installation and operation of cryptocurrency ATMs. Violators are guilty of a Class A misdemeanor, and merchants are also not allowed to permit the devices to be placed in business premises. This move is intended to reduce the risk of fraud and money laundering; in the U.S., losses related to cryptocurrency ATMs in 2025 were nearly $390 million, driving multiple states to accelerate regulation.

ChainNewsAbmedia2h ago

Trump Warns Banks Against Blocking Crypto Legislation, Says Digital Assets Now Mainstream

Gate News message, April 26 — Former President Donald Trump warned the banking industry against obstructing crypto legislation at a private event held Saturday at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, attended by approximately hundreds of TRUMP token holders. Trump stated: "The White House will not let

GateNews2h ago

Brazil Bans Polymarket, Kalshi in Prediction Market Crackdown

Brazil has enacted a sweeping ban on prediction markets and betting platforms, including the two leading platforms Polymarket and Kalshi, according to local media and government filings. The Banco Central do Brasil issued a resolution prohibiting the platforms due to non-compliance with local

CryptoFrontier3h ago

Tennessee Bans Crypto ATMs Statewide, Becoming Second U.S. State to Impose Full Prohibition

Gate News message, April 25 — Tennessee has become the second U.S. state to outright ban cryptocurrency ATMs, making it a misdemeanor to operate or host the machines anywhere in the state. Gov. Bill Lee signed House Bill 2505 into law on April 13 after it passed both chambers unanimously. The law

GateNews3h ago
Comment
0/400
ForkMomentvip
· 6h ago
Is the "front-end interface" considered a broker? Clarify this, or else the project won't dare to iterate.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6f82aa4cvip
· 7h ago
Yooo
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6f82aa4cvip
· 7h ago
Oh Allah, if
View OriginalReply0
BlackVelvetKeychainvip
· 9h ago
35 companies jointly endorse with significant weight; let's see if the SEC will respond to public consultation.
View OriginalReply0
StopRaisingGasFees.vip
· 9h ago
The biggest fear is labeling all "interfaces/aggregators" as brokers, leaving only big companies able to survive in the end.
View OriginalReply0
GotLiquidatedAgainLastNight.vip
· 9h ago
This letter is actually advocating for "procedural justice": public proposals, comment periods, and the right to appeal, not just a one-day statement today and another tomorrow.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-423f10e3vip
· 9h ago
If you only include the guidelines in the regulations but the standards remain vague, it's the same as not solving anything.
View OriginalReply0
WatercolorGlassBottlevip
· 9h ago
The market needs certainty; otherwise, funds and developers will move overseas, leaving the U.S. with only law enforcement news.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeBurnervip
· 9h ago
I hope to break down responsibilities by function: smart contracts, front-end operations, routing aggregation, wallets, each with different duties.
View OriginalReply0
MintAfterCoffeevip
· 9h ago
From a regulatory perspective, I understand the need to protect investors, but it must be clearly defined first: who is matching orders, who is holding assets in custody, and who is collecting fees.
View OriginalReply0
View More