White House advisor responds to Jamie Dimon: Stablecoin yields are not equivalent to bank deposits; GENIUS Act regulatory logic becomes the focus again

March 4 News: U.S. stablecoin regulation disputes have heated up again. Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the White House President’s Advisory Council on Digital Assets, recently responded publicly to Jamie Dimon’s criticism of stablecoin yield mechanisms, stating that his view is “misleading” and emphasizing that stablecoin yields are not the same as bank deposit interest in terms of regulatory logic.

Previously, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon told CNBC that if a stablecoin platform offers yields or interest on user balances, it essentially functions like banking and should be subject to the same regulatory requirements as traditional banks. He pointed out that the U.S. banking system must comply with strict rules, including federal deposit insurance, anti-money laundering regulations, and capital adequacy, and that stablecoin issuers offering yields should be under a similar framework.

In response, Patrick Witt later clarified on social media that this view confuses key issues. He noted that the real regulatory concern should be lending or re-hypothecation of customer funds, not simply providing yields on balances. “The misleading part is equating the yield mechanism itself with banking business,” Witt said. The U.S. GENIUS Act explicitly restricts stablecoin issuers from re-hypothecating or lending reserve funds, so stablecoin balances should not be considered as bank deposits.

The controversy over stablecoin yield mechanisms is also a significant reason for the slow legislative progress on U.S. crypto market structure. Although the GENIUS Act passed in 2025 established a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, disagreements remain between the banking industry and the crypto sector over yield models. Banks worry that allowing stablecoins to offer yields could attract large amounts of funds away from traditional banking systems.

Meanwhile, industry insiders believe that compliant stablecoins can not only improve payment efficiency but also become an important infrastructure for digital financial products. Some policy discussions have proposed compromises, such as rewarding only transaction activity rather than paying yields on account balances.

Currently, the White House continues to organize closed-door meetings with bank executives and digital asset industry representatives, seeking a balanced approach between stablecoin yield models and banking regulation. However, sources say that despite frequent discussions, no clear consensus has yet been reached.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

South African Economist Flags Authoritarian Risks in CBDCs

Economist Dawie Roodt has issued a warning that central bank digital currencies could become tools for authoritarian control due to their “programmable” nature. The Authoritarian Risk South African economist Dawie Roodt warned that central bank digital currencies, or CBDCs, could become

Coinpedia2h ago

The Wall Street Journal: International situation and employment data put the Federal Reserve in a dilemma, and it may remain on the sidelines in the short term

The Wall Street Journal reporter Timiraos analyzed that recent employment reports have intensified the Federal Reserve's dilemma between combating inflation and protecting jobs. Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari warned against repeating the mistakes of 2021, predicting that the Fed will not rush to adjust interest rates in the short term. If the unemployment rate rises, rate cuts may resume around mid-year, but if inflation risks increase, internal opposition voices will grow. Overall, the central bank faces a difficult choice.

GateNews5h ago

U.S. CLARITY Act Sparks Controversy: White House Crypto Official and Banking Industry Clash Over Stablecoin Incentives

On March 8th, the discussion of the U.S. CLARITY Act sparked debates between the banking industry and White House officials. The president of the Texas Independent Bankers Association stated that a compromise would impact the local economy, while White House advisors warned that no compromise could lead to disastrous consequences.

GateNews7h ago

CME Data: Probability of the Federal Reserve holding interest rates steady in March rises to 96.3%

Gate News Report, March 7 — According to CME "FedWatch" data, the probability of the Federal Reserve maintaining interest rates in March is 96.3%, while the probability of a 25 basis point rate cut is 3.7%.

GateNews16h ago

Chicago Federal Reserve President Goolsbee: The Federal Reserve is expected to start cutting interest rates by the end of the year

Gate News Report, March 7th, Chicago Federal Reserve Chair Goolsby stated that the Federal Reserve is expected to start cutting interest rates before the end of this year.

GateNews16h ago

Natixis Analyst: The Federal Reserve's March Meeting May Face Calls for Rate Cuts

Gate News Report, March 7 — Christopher Hodge from Natixis stated that the Federal Reserve may face calls for rate cuts at the March FOMC meeting. He pointed out that if the economic data for February shows weakness and January's data is revised downward, the Fed's decision to hold steady will be questioned by the market. He believes this situation will reinforce the dovish view that recent labor market data may just be "fool's gold" (appearing good on the surface but lacking real value).

GateNews17h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments