- New bill protects non-custodial developers from unfair prosecution.
- Clarifies that Section 1960 applies only to those who control customer funds.
- Bill draws a line between coders and money transmitters.
- Backers say it safeguards U.S. crypto innovation.
US lawmakers have introduced the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026 to protect software developers from criminal prosecution. The measure, which aims to draw a boundary between entities that control user funds and those who merely write code, includes a provision that the DeFi sector has long pressed for to be part of the CLARITY Act
Drawing the Line Between Developers and Money Transmitters
On Friday, Reps. Scott Fitzgerald, Zoe Lofgren, and Ben Cline introduced the novel bill to block the prosecution of software developers who write code, as opposed to those who hold and transmit customers’ assets. The legislation clarifies that Section 1960 of the Criminal Code only applies to developers who handle funds
It applies to individuals or entities that transfer funds on behalf of others without proper state licenses or that fail to comply with federal registration requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) obligations. The law is commonly used to prosecute illegal money transmission schemes, including those involving digital assets, when operators are found to be moving or controlling customer funds without authorization.
![]()
![]()
ADVERTISEMENTSection 1960 refers to 18 U.S.C. § 1960 of the federal criminal code, which classifies as criminal activity the operation of unlicensed money transmitting businesses. It makes it unlawful for anyone or any entity to transfer funds for others without the requisite state licenses and federal compliance requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) provisions
Authorities often invoke the provision to pursue unlawful money transmission schemes, including crypto-related cases, where individuals are accused of holding or moving customer funds without regulatory clearance.
The bill presents regulatory clarity to the debate of whether non-custodial developers should be prosecuted the same way as custodial actors. It aligns with the initial intent of Section 1960 and represents Congressional and judicial consensus on the matter
ADVERTISEMENT## Protecting Innovation While Targeting Criminal Activity
While section 1960 originally applied to custodial developers, the cases of Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet, where the law was applied to developers who wrote only code, necessitated the clear boundaries the bill establishes.
“For too long,” said Rep. Cline, “federal overreach has blurred the line between bad actors and the innovators building next-generation technology.”
“This bipartisan bill restores needed clarity by protecting developers who don’t control customer funds, while ensuring law enforcement can continue to target real criminals. I’m proud to support this effort to keep America the global leader in blockchain innovation.”
Over the past few years, experts raised an alarm over a massive outflow of American developers to other jurisdictions due to the fear of unfair prosecution. Once the new legislation gets passed, it will ensure the protection of these non-custodial developers, and by extension, secure the future of American leadership in the digital asset space.
ADVERTISEMENT
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Brazil's Crypto Faction Prepare to Fight Stablecoin Taxation in Congress
The crypto faction in the Brazilian Congress is expecting the issuance of a decree to establish a 3.5% tax on stablecoin transactions to file a draft bill and block this initiative. The Parliamentary Front for the Free Market argues that the measure would constitute an overreach of the Executive
Coinpedia51m ago
Lummis pushes for crypto tax exemptions before stepping down, CLARITY bill stalemate remains unresolved
Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis is advocating for tax exemptions on cryptocurrency transactions under $300 to promote everyday use of cryptocurrencies. However, the CLARITY Act faces obstacles in the Senate, mainly due to regulatory disputes over crypto token stocks and opposition from the banking industry. With Lummis stepping down soon, the legislative prospects remain uncertain.
MarketWhisper1h ago
U.S. CFTC Chair Outlines Future Priorities: Clarifying Crypto Regulations, Ending Regulatory Disputes with SEC, and More
CFTC Chairman Mike Selig stated at the conference that the United States is experiencing a technological revolution driven by AI and blockchain, emphasizing the need to adjust the regulatory framework to adapt to changes. Key areas include derivatives market regulation, addressing legacy issues in legislation, clarifying the classification of crypto contracts, and prioritizing agricultural and energy needs.
GateNews1h ago
U.S. banking industry plans to sue OCC over blocking crypto licenses, BPI says regulatory rules are being distorted
The US banking industry is considering filing a lawsuit against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) because the OCC has granted national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency and fintech companies. BPI believes this move is illegal and has led to regulatory unfairness. Opposing voices include the Banking Association and state regulators, who argue that this measure could bypass traditional regulation. The OCC has approved licenses for multiple crypto companies, but this has sparked controversy, especially with applications from companies related to the Trump family drawing congressional scrutiny. If the lawsuit succeeds, it could impact the compliance status of crypto companies and the regulatory framework.
MarketWhisper2h ago
What is the impact of the SEC's issuance of interpretive guidance promoting a "Token Classification Framework" on the cryptocurrency industry?
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has submitted new interpretive guidance on crypto assets, planning to establish a token classification framework to clearly define which crypto assets are securities and their related regulatory requirements. The guidance aims to fill legislative gaps and influence the operational models of crypto companies. As the global digital asset market develops, the U.S. regulatory framework is moving towards institutionalization, which could change global regulatory trends.
区块客2h ago
Moldova investigates cases of cryptocurrency interference in parliamentary elections involving a total of $107 million
Moldova's National Anti-Corruption Center has disclosed a plan to influence the 2025 parliamentary elections using cryptocurrency, involving a total amount of $107 million. The funds are transferred through non-custodial crypto wallets to intermediaries, who then exchange them for cash to bribe voters and promote candidates. The source of the funds is mainly from crypto platforms in Russia and Kyrgyzstan.
GateNews2h ago
