Decentralized lending protocol ZeroLend announced on February 16th that after three years of operation, it will cease all business activities. The team stated that multiple early-supported blockchains have become inactive or experienced significant liquidity shrinkage, oracle providers have stopped support, and frequent hacker attacks have led to long-term losses that make continued operation impossible. ZeroLend’s TVL has plummeted from a peak of nearly $359 million to just $6.6 million, a decrease of over 98%.
(Background: What is modular lending, and will it become the next DeFi hotspot?)
(Additional context: Detailed explanation of DeFi lending “liquidation mechanisms”: risk overview of Compound, Maker, AAVE)
Table of Contents
- The Four Main Causes of Death: Chain Depletion, Oracle Disruption, Hacker Attacks, Zero Profits
- TVL Dropped from $359 Million to $6.6 Million
- Some Funds May Be Trapped: Attention for Manta, Zircuit, XLayer Users
- The Harsh Reality of DeFi Lending
Multi-chain decentralized lending protocol ZeroLend issued an official announcement on February 16th, revealing a “difficult decision”—to terminate the protocol after three years of operation. The team admitted that the protocol has been in long-term loss and cannot sustain operations under multiple pressures. Currently, most market loan-to-value ratios (LTV) have been set to 0%, effectively prohibiting new borrowing, and only allowing users to withdraw funds.
The Four Main Causes of Death: Chain Depletion, Oracle Disruption, Hacker Attacks, Zero Profits
ZeroLend detailed four reasons for its closure in the announcement:
- Support chains become inactive: Several early deployed blockchains supported by ZeroLend have become inactive or experienced significant liquidity shrinkage, rendering the protocol’s operations on these chains essentially meaningless.
- Oracle providers cease support: Disruption of price data sources directly impacts the core lending and liquidation mechanisms of the protocol.
- Increase in hacker and scam attacks: The inherently high-risk nature of lending protocols makes them frequent targets for attacks.
- Thin profit margins lead to long-term losses: The profit space for lending protocols is extremely limited; combined with the above pressures, the situation worsens.
TVL Dropped from $359 Million to $6.6 Million
According to data from DefiLlama, ZeroLend’s total value locked (TVL) peaked at nearly $359 million in November 2024, but has since declined sharply, now remaining around $6.6 million, an evaporation of over 98%. This data vividly reflects the liquidity exhaustion across multiple chains.
Some Funds May Be Trapped: Attention for Manta, Zircuit, XLayer Users
ZeroLend strongly recommends users withdraw remaining funds from the platform as soon as possible via the official app. However, not all users can withdraw smoothly—on chains like Manta, Zircuit, and XLayer, where liquidity has severely deteriorated, some funds are currently locked and tied to inactive positions.
The team stated that solutions are being developed for these affected assets, including executing time lock upgrades to reallocate funds. However, specific timelines and details have not yet been announced, and whether trapped users can recover their full funds remains uncertain.
The Harsh Reality of DeFi Lending
ZeroLend’s collapse is not an isolated case but a reflection of the brutal reshuffling in the DeFi lending space. In this sector, major protocols like Aave and Compound already dominate most of the market share. Smaller protocols struggle to survive in a razor-thin profit margin environment, while also facing high maintenance costs across multiple chains, oracle dependency risks, and ongoing security threats.
For users holding assets on ZeroLend, the immediate priority is to withdraw funds from the platform and closely monitor any subsequent announcements regarding solutions for trapped assets.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Circle Moves $68 Million in 30 Minutes Using USDC, Showing Real Power of Stablecoin Payments
Circle recently demonstrated the transformative potential of stablecoins in corporate finance by swiftly transferring $68 million using USDC, showcasing advantages like instant settlement and improved transparency over traditional banking methods.
CryptometerIo7m ago
Cardano promotes stablecoin USDCx, aiming for direct withdrawals without bridges
Input Output Group (IOG) has clarified its strategy for expanding stablecoin integration on Cardano through the USDCx infrastructure. This system, backed 1:1 by USD Coin in Circle's xReserve smart contract, enables various DeFi activities, targeting direct USDC withdrawals to enhance liquidity without relying on bridges. IOG emphasizes that USDCx is a long-term upgrade for Cardano's financial infrastructure.
TapChiBitcoin3h ago
X Money Account Opening Process Revealed: Complete in Less Than 1 Minute, Supports Facial Recognition Verification
Crypto KOL AB Kuai.Dong revealed the account opening process for X Money. Users only need to enter basic information to open an account within 1 minute. X Money supports virtual and physical cards, offering withdrawal and spending functions, with a transfer limit of $1,000,000 and a withdrawal limit of $100,000.
GateNews4h ago
CEO BitGo: Crypto company has a structural advantage in the digital asset custody race
Mike Belshe, CEO of BitGo, highlights the structural advantages of native crypto companies in digital asset custody, contrasting with traditional banks' conflicts of interest. BitGo generates over 80% of its revenue from stable custody fees, recently receiving a federal banking license. As of September 2025, BitGo is safeguarding $104 billion in assets for over 4,900 institutional clients globally.
TapChiBitcoin6h ago
AI and the Operational Challenges of DeFi Funds
Crypto liquidity funds are rapidly growing as institutional investors show increased interest in digital assets and DeFi strategies. However, many fund managers still rely on inefficient tools like spreadsheets for portfolio tracking across various exchanges and protocols. The complexity of DeFi activities complicates accurate performance and risk assessments, highlighting the need for AI solutions to automate protocol classification and portfolio analysis.
TapChiBitcoin6h ago
Ripple’s Global Payments Expansion Strengthens XRP’s Institutional Role
Ripple’s global payments network is rapidly expanding as financial institutions increasingly seek full-service blockchain infrastructure partners, positioning Ripple’s ecosystem and XRP liquidity framework at the center of next-generation cross-border finance.
Ripple’s Expanding Payments Network
Coinpedia6h ago