Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about modular blockchains. To put it simply, the most intuitive changes for ordinary users might be two points: cheaper and faster transactions, and the fact that "where the money/data is located at each layer" has become more complicated. Previously, using a single chain, if there was a problem, you just focused on it; now, execution, data, and settlement are separated. If any link like transfers, cross-layer operations, bridges, or sequencers experiences a delay, the feeling is: why is there more latency again / why do I need to sign multiple times...
Additionally, with recent staking and shared security models being criticized as "nested," I can understand. Who is ultimately responsible for security, and who compensates if something goes wrong? It's quite difficult to clarify. Anyway, I personally trust data more—things like options skew, funding rates, and large on-chain transfers at least won't be staged. Sometimes, intuition just gets emotional. Risk control should come first; don’t be misled by the idea that "one more layer means one more source of profit."