According to @intangiblecoins, he stated during discussions at the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas that the Bitcoin community is gradually reaching a preliminary consensus on the threat of quantum computing.
First, most opinions believe that there should be no interference with Satoshi's P2PK address assets to maintain Bitcoin's core property rights; at the same time, since Satoshi's assets are dispersed across approximately 22,000 addresses (50 BTC per address) rather than a single large "honeypot," the actual risk of a full-scale quantum attack is lower than expected. Second, the community generally supports developing and testing post-quantum (PQ) cryptographic technologies for Bitcoin, as a backup plan in case of emergency, but the premise is that related work should not trigger consensus deadlock or introduce untested technical risks.
According to @intangiblecoins, he stated during discussions at the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas that the Bitcoin community is gradually reaching a preliminary consensus on the threat of quantum computing.
First, most opinions believe that there should be no interference with Satoshi's P2PK address assets to maintain Bitcoin's core property rights; at the same time, since Satoshi's assets are dispersed across approximately 22,000 addresses (50 BTC per address) rather than a single large "honeypot," the actual risk of a full-scale quantum attack is lower than expected.
Second, the community generally supports developing and testing post-quantum (PQ) cryptographic technologies for Bitcoin, as a backup plan in case of emergency, but the premise is that related work should not trigger consensus deadlock or introduce untested technical risks.