I see many KOLs claiming that Powell's remarks were hawkish—typical hindsight bias. If it were truly hawkish, why did the market hold support instead of breaking lower? They're looking at the massive selloff and market sentiment beforehand, which seems to make sense, but if the market truly didn't anticipate hawkish comments, it should have continued breaking down, not held. This is pure reasoning backward from conclusion.

They mention safe-haven assets like gold dropping 3%, Bitcoin and silver down 4%, but those declines clearly started before the meeting.

This is why retail traders never make money—they can't figure out what market logic actually is. Most retail traders are constantly guided by the market, following so many KOLs, and most KOLs are just reselling market sentiment. Following so many only confuses you more; it's pointless. To tell if a KOL has real skill or is just bluffing, allocate 9U and split it into three positions—open trades following one KOL. Only if they consistently profit long-term does that prove they have real ability. Even then, splitting into three helps avoid mistakes. If they still don't make money, everything is just empty talk. Gradually you can filter out who are actual traders and who are market promoters.