On February 28, U.S. lawmakers from both parties jointly introduced the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” on February 26, aiming to clarify the legal responsibilities of blockchain developers and prevent open-source code authors from being mistakenly classified as remittance institutions. The proposal, led by Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren, focuses on amending Section 1960 of the U.S. Code to target custodians who control customer assets or execute transfers on behalf of users.
The bill suggests that, amid rising debates over whether “open-source software developers should bear remittance licensing responsibilities” and “legal risks for non-custodial blockchain developers,” clear exemptions should be provided for entities that only write or distribute code. The ongoing lawsuits related to Tornado Cash have further amplified industry concerns about “code as crime.” Ben Cline noted that long-term regulatory expansion blurs the line between malicious actors and technological innovators; Scott Fitzgerald also emphasized that innovators should not face undue law enforcement pressure for developing infrastructure.
Industry support has come from the Solana Institute and the Blockchain Association, which believe the bill will help establish a clear framework distinguishing “open-source developers from custodial financial intermediaries.” Meanwhile, discussions in Washington also include topics like the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act. The former, passed by the House in 2025 but with slowed progress, aims to clarify regulations, while the latter enhances stablecoin oversight without expanding developer responsibilities.
Analysts believe that if enacted, the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” will set a precedent for reshaping the U.S. crypto regulatory framework and defining blockchain developers’ compliance boundaries. Ongoing lobbying efforts continue, and the specific wording and scope of the Section 1960 amendments could be a key factor influencing U.S. crypto policy in 2026.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Trump signs executive order to combat cybercrime, requiring multiple agencies to submit action plans within 120 days
U.S. President Trump signed an executive order on March 6th to combat cybercrime and fraud, requiring relevant ministers to review frameworks and develop action plans. The order establishes an action team to coordinate the fight against transnational cybercrime and proposes a victim recovery plan to compensate victims of online fraud. At the same time, it calls for negotiations with countries that tolerate such crimes and measures to restrict them.
GateNews31m ago
New Stablecoin Rules Passed By Florida Lawmakers
Florida lawmakers have passed a bill to regulate stablecoins, establishing clear rules for issuance, oversight, and consumer protection. This bipartisan effort aims to provide regulatory certainty and attract blockchain innovation while ensuring financial stability and transparency.
TodayqNews48m ago
Patrick Witt Calls Out The Irony At Banks’ Stance On Clarity Act
White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt highlighted that the big banks’ unwillingness to reach a compromise with the crypto sector on the Clarity Act discussions will only keep stablecoins unregulated and amplify their concerns about deposit flight.
The digital asset adviser of the White House, Pa
Blockzeit1h ago
Vancouver "Bitcoin Reserve" Dream Shattered! City Hall Staff "This Reason" Suggests Withdraw Proposal
Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim proposed establishing a "Bitcoin Strategic Reserve," but city officials assessed that Bitcoin does not meet legal investment standards and recommended that the city council withdraw the proposal. According to the report, Bitcoin is not classified as a legal asset and requires reallocation of human resources to align with municipal priority plans. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs of British Columbia has already stated that local governments are not permitted to include cryptocurrencies in their financial reserves to avoid risks.
区块客1h ago
House Pushes Back on Senate’s 2030 CBDC Ban Expiry
United States Congress is debating a CBDC ban after lawmakers challenged the Senate’s 2030 expiration clause.
Ted Cruz proposed an amendment to remove the sunset clause and make the CBDC prohibition permanent.
House lawmakers oppose the temporary ban, warning it could allow a future U.S.
CryptoFrontNews3h ago
South Korea plans to ban corporate investments in stablecoins, and USDT and USDC may be excluded from the permitted scope.
Gate News Report, March 7 — According to Korean media, the Korea Financial Services Commission is drafting the "Corporate Virtual Currency Trading Guidelines," which may exclude stablecoins from the permitted investment scope. The guidelines will outline the standards for listed companies and registered professional investment firms to trade digital assets for investment or financial purposes. To prevent reckless investments in the early stages of the market, regulators have decided to exclude dollar-pegged stablecoins such as Tether (USDT( and USD Coin )USDC( from the allowable investment range.
GateNews3h ago
