Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
The payment public chain track is very lively, but most projects only boast about "low Gas." What’s the result? Slow settlement times, fluctuating stablecoin transfer fees, and a terrible user experience.
Some projects have made real progress. Zero-fee USD₮ transfers, instant settlement, and over 1000+ TPS throughput—these numbers look impressive, but the key is whether they are truly usable. The Paymaster contract allows users to pay Gas fees without actually paying, backed by an initial stablecoin liquidity of over $2 billion. The entire system design is solid.
The tech stack is also interesting. EVM compatibility means low migration costs for developers, no need to rewrite contracts. The trust-minimized cross-chain bridging design connects values across different chains, which is the real approach to solving practical problems.
Compared to those projects that only talk about visions without real implementation, the true standards of evaluation are three: How large is the actual user base? What is the on-chain transfer frequency? Can it operate stably? These are the areas where payment infrastructure should speak for itself.
Honestly, it all comes down to on-chain data; user numbers and transfer frequency are the most truthful indicators.
The Paymaster system really packs a punch—free transfers with instant settlement. This is what payment should look like.
Most public chain projects sound good, but in reality, users can't even use them, it's hilarious.
Wait, is the 2 billion liquidity initial or already deployed? This detail is quite important.
Honestly, it all comes down to user numbers and on-chain activity; everything else is superficial.
20 billion in liquidity sounds impressive, but how long it can sustain depends on actual trading volume.
The Paymaster system does solve some issues, but its stability remains to be seen.
Those who only boast about low Gas fees should have been eliminated long ago—it's so annoying.
Has anyone actually used that Paymaster? Not just hype, is it really zero fees?
It's easy to look at the numbers; retaining users is the real skill.
In simple terms, the numbers look good, but it depends on whether people are actually using it on the chain.
How long can the gas-free model last? This kind of subsidy approach won't work in the long run.
That's right, no matter how good the numbers look, if they don't translate into real use, it's all meaningless. It all depends on who dares to reveal actual transaction volumes.
The paymaster approach indeed addresses the pain points; it's much smarter than just lowering fees.
Instant到账确实可以，但20亿流动性撑得住多久？别到时候又是一地鸡毛。
EVM兼容这块确实解决了开发者的pain point，但跨链桥接的安全性谁来保证？Trust minimization听起来不错，实际呢。
This kind of project ultimately still depends on DAU and on-chain transaction frequency. Without these two metrics, any claims are just empty talk.
Really stable operation for a year before bragging; too many projects are just fleeting moments now.
---
A bunch of hype about TPS, but few can run steadily; that's the most frustrating part.
---
EVM compatibility is brilliant; developers don't need to rewrite contracts, saving a lot of trouble.
---
With 2 billion in liquidity backing, it's not a small move; it seems they are serious about doing this.
---
Don't talk to me about Paymaster; the key is to look at the actual number of on-chain users—everything else is nonsense.
---
The payment track should be viewed this way—user volume, transfer frequency, stability; all other gimmicks should step aside.
---
Heard too many pie-in-the-sky plans over the years; very few have actually been implemented and used.
---
The idea of trust-minimized cross-chain design sounds good, but can it truly run safely and stably? That's the real question.