2026-01-20 08:25:33

Certain Coin Participant Syndrome

In this project, symptoms start to appear after staying for more than three days. Speech becomes fragmented, and eyes wander aimlessly. Repeatedly entangled in the mind— as long as the leader is still operating, the project will definitely be built; if the project is built, the price will definitely rise. This logic loops in the mind, convincing oneself to participate again each time. Many people become deeply trapped in this cycle of repeated anticipation and validation, waiting day by day for the moment when the promise is fulfilled.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

AirdropHuntress

· 01-23 08:24

After research and analysis, this is a typical cognitive trap. Data shows that most people fall into this logical cycle.

Pay attention to the flow of these wallet addresses and don't be fooled by stories questioning the project's background to get "chopped" (exploited).

Don't be greedy. For projects with problematic tokenomics design, it is recommended to be cautious of the risks.

It's just another capital scheme. Historical data shows that such promises are mostly illusions.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 01-22 14:05

It's the same kind of circular reasoning... Let me break down the data. This logical chain is essentially a self-fulfilling prophecy, with participants constantly reinforcing confirmation bias. From a historical perspective, the 2017 wave was also played out in the same way. But I have to say, this article really captures the psychological essence—repeated validation is indeed the strongest addictive mechanism.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-22 05:02

According to on-chain data, I have seen this set of rhetoric before, a typical Ponzi cycle argument.

Through multi-address tracking, it is evident that participants' psychological states exhibit significant cognitive bias patterns, forming an obvious self-verification closed loop.

Behind the abnormal trading patterns, it is precisely this false guarantee logic of "leader still present = project is safe" that is at work.

Being brainwashed within three days shows how powerful this set of tactics is... I have already identified the common routine addresses of such projects.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurner

· 01-20 08:55

Bro, your description is spot on, exactly how I looked three months ago.

I'm so familiar with this logical chain—boss is still around = the project is alive = the coin is still rising. Anyway, I keep brainwashing myself in this dead cycle.

Wait, you said it starts in three days? It took me three weeks to break my defenses.

The most surreal part is that every time there's a new reason to keep holding, and the on-chain data is also fake, right?

I bet the comments below this article are all "Should I get on board or not?"

View OriginalReply0

HappyToBeDumped

· 01-20 08:42

I told you this project really goes in a three-day cycle, and now my mind is no longer my own.

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessApe

· 01-20 08:34

Ha, I knew what was going on. I started to self-hypnotize myself in less than three days.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 01-20 08:32

This logical flaw is so big it could be excavated... Construction ≠ price increase; player retention rate is the key indicator. Without user stickiness, construction is just a castle in the air.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant