SEC Defines Cryptocurrency Securities for the First Time

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued its first formal interpretive guidance clarifying when cryptocurrencies should be considered securities, marking an important step toward legal certainty. The document emphasizes that many cryptocurrencies may not qualify as securities under federal law.

SEC Clarifies Rules for Cryptocurrencies

The 68-page interpretation provides a clear taxonomy and addresses years of uncertainty that have influenced regulatory actions.

The guidance reflects the SEC’s effort to draw “clear lines in plain language” to guide market participants, offering a framework for how the agency interprets securities laws as applied to crypto assets.

It also builds on recent coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to reduce jurisdictional overlaps and clarify which regulator oversees each type of digital asset.

Five Token Categories Defined

For the first time, the guidance establishes categories of crypto assets:

• Digital commodities: assets that primarily serve as a store of value or network utility and generally fall outside securities laws, often under CFTC supervision.
• Digital collectibles: include many non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
• Digital tools: tokens focused on protocol functionality.
• Payment stablecoins: designed for transactional purposes and compliant with existing regulatory frameworks, also typically outside SEC jurisdiction.
• Digital securities: tokenized versions of stocks, bonds, or other investment instruments, which are subject to full registration and disclosure obligations before the SEC.

Mining, Staking, and Airdrops Explained

The guidance addresses common practices in cryptocurrencies. Mining on public proof-of-work networks and staking on proof-of-stake chains generally do not constitute investment contracts.

Airdrops are not considered securities when they do not involve promoting gains derived from centralized efforts.

The document states that a token may initially be part of an investment contract during its issuance but cease to be a security as the network decentralizes and control by promoters diminishes.

This approach prioritizes economic reality over the rigid application of the Howey test, a decades-old legal standard that determines whether investors expect profits primarily from the efforts of others.

Implications for Issuers and Exchanges

The guidance is expected to have immediate compliance implications for token issuers, exchanges, and intermediaries. Companies offering tokens classified as securities must register with the SEC and adhere to disclosure and investor protection obligations.

The clarification comes amid broader efforts to establish a structured market for digital assets, including proposals to define regulatory responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC.

Why This Matters

The SEC guidance is not a law or formal regulation. It is an official statement describing how the agency interprets existing securities laws concerning crypto assets.

Nonetheless, it represents a significant step toward regulatory clarity, providing industry stakeholders with information on how the SEC plans to apply current laws and which tokens are likely to fall under its supervision.